Unfortunately not much research has been done on conclusion thinking. Let me tell you what conclusion thinking is. It is a sophisticated thinking which is derivative from women doing the work of two people. Women doing the work of two people over the generations of thousand years or more... for example will have to have developed a sophisticated way of reducing time in order to achieve two peoples work in one day (work of two people, hunting, bearing children etc) in comparison to a women doing only the work of one person, bearing children, looking after children, cooking, cleaning, shopping, agricultural etc etc....
Conclusion thinking can be passed down onto boys and girls into different cultures but its blueprint is from amazonian women. Conclusion thinking is the conscious mind and the subconscious mind heavily fused together, past and future, all memory, visual and conversation, logic, abstract; you name it coupled with heavy imagination - it gets rid of "watery thinking" and keys down on the heavy underlying reasoning which we can call conclusion thinking. It is known of a West African ethnic group who think of ideas simultaneously- this is a result of heavy underlying holistic reasoning (conclusion imagination). Many people have conclusion thinking and don't know that it differs from people who come from a social path lineage who may take long or longer to reach a conclusion.
Conclusion thinking is once again a sophisticated way of thinking but if one does not possess the right information before making their conclusion, it could be a disastrous outcome. Conclusion thinking is often linked to people with ADHD; again ADHD is not a disorder but a cultural misunderstanding. So its good to conclude but at the same time to hold out for some time and reserve judgement and get more information and think before speaking.
Conclusion thinking is linked to reducing time over the centuries. It is about achieving a lot of personal objectives within a short period of time as a result of doing the work of two people. People with ADHD may come across as not being realistic with their timing in comparison to people from a social path lineage. But conclusion thinking reduces time. Conclusion thinking is normally linked to people who think fast from an amazonian lineage.
Someone with conclusion thinking has a very rich thinking and can think about may be 50 to 100 things at the same time whilst someone from a social path lineage can think may be one or two to 10 things at the same time. They may come across as day dreaming but because their thinking is very rich, there is a lot to see and imagine from this pool of concentrated reasoning.
They may appear to have attention deficit but in essence they can switch to and through to different thinking or conversations and then revert back to the original conversation as if the trail had not been lost. So it may appear to scientists that it is a deficit disorder but it is not in many cases.
Conclusion thinking can be passed down onto boys and girls into different cultures but its blueprint is from amazonian women. Conclusion thinking is the conscious mind and the subconscious mind heavily fused together, past and future, all memory, visual and conversation, logic, abstract; you name it coupled with heavy imagination - it gets rid of "watery thinking" and keys down on the heavy underlying reasoning which we can call conclusion thinking. It is known of a West African ethnic group who think of ideas simultaneously- this is a result of heavy underlying holistic reasoning (conclusion imagination). Many people have conclusion thinking and don't know that it differs from people who come from a social path lineage who may take long or longer to reach a conclusion.
Conclusion thinking is once again a sophisticated way of thinking but if one does not possess the right information before making their conclusion, it could be a disastrous outcome. Conclusion thinking is often linked to people with ADHD; again ADHD is not a disorder but a cultural misunderstanding. So its good to conclude but at the same time to hold out for some time and reserve judgement and get more information and think before speaking.
Conclusion thinking is linked to reducing time over the centuries. It is about achieving a lot of personal objectives within a short period of time as a result of doing the work of two people. People with ADHD may come across as not being realistic with their timing in comparison to people from a social path lineage. But conclusion thinking reduces time. Conclusion thinking is normally linked to people who think fast from an amazonian lineage.
Someone with conclusion thinking has a very rich thinking and can think about may be 50 to 100 things at the same time whilst someone from a social path lineage can think may be one or two to 10 things at the same time. They may come across as day dreaming but because their thinking is very rich, there is a lot to see and imagine from this pool of concentrated reasoning.
They may appear to have attention deficit but in essence they can switch to and through to different thinking or conversations and then revert back to the original conversation as if the trail had not been lost. So it may appear to scientists that it is a deficit disorder but it is not in many cases.
No comments:
Post a Comment